On-site automotive operations consulting for dealer principals and used car managers at small and mid-size dealerships. Built on 20+ years of experience, 10 years of management, and 25,000+ vehicles appraised.
On-site analysis of what you have, how you are buying, and what your market actually supports.
Direct, on-the-floor development for the manager making daily buying decisions.
Independent evaluation of AI vendors in the automotive space. Before you spend budget on tools that do not deliver.
I have been in automotive for over 20 years. Ten of those years were in management. For most of that time, my job was buying cars, specifically appraising and purchasing more than 25,000 vehicles at CarMax, one of the most analytically rigorous used car operations in the country.
That experience is a reference point. When you buy over 25,000 vehicles, you develop the pattern recognition to know what a car is worth in a specific market, at a specific moment, against specific competition. You stop estimating and start seeing.
Carsultant launched in 2018 as a wholesale business, strictly auction-based at first. I built a 5.0 seller rating at Manheim operating by a single standard: every vehicle disclosed or fixed, backed by a no-questions-asked money-back guarantee. Dealer relationships followed from that track record. Those relationships became the foundation for the consulting practice, which grew directly out of the conversations dealers kept starting about why their used car operations were not performing.
A dealer I worked with had inventory concentrated entirely above $40,000. Nothing in the $25,000 range. One vehicle tested at that price point sold in two days and the dealer wanted more. That is what closing an inventory gap looks like when the analysis is based on what the market is actually telling you.
My consulting work builds on that experience. I work on-site, with the actual inventory and the people managing it. The goal is not to produce a report, but to change what is happening on the lot.
I also evaluate AI and technology vendors in the automotive space. Most cannot demonstrate specifically how their product produces the result they are selling. I do that evaluation so dealerships are not spending budget on demos dressed up as solutions.
I also work directly with technology companies and AI developers building products for the automotive market. If your product depends on understanding how dealers actually operate, how buying decisions get made, how inventory moves, how technology gets adopted on the floor, or how dealerships evaluate new tools, 20 years of automotive operations and 25,000 appraisals is a reference point a focus group cannot replicate.
If your used car operation is underperforming and you want to know specifically why, that is the conversation to have.
Dealer principals and used car managers at small and mid-size dealerships whose used car performance is not where it should be and who want to know specifically why.
I come on-site and look at the operation: current inventory, sourcing channels, acquisition decisions, pricing, turn rate, and what the local market actually supports. I identify the gaps between what the lot has and what the market needs. Then I build a specific action plan with the dealer principal and work through it with the team.
This is not a report. It is not a set of recommendations delivered and left for someone else to execute. The work is done on the lot, with the people making decisions.
Initial on-site assessment covering inventory, sourcing, market analysis, and team review. Project scope defined from that assessment. Engagements are project-based or hybrid retainer depending on the dealership's situation.
This engagement works for dealerships that are willing to make changes based on what the analysis shows. It does not work for franchise operations that are not open to expanding beyond the OEM line, or for dealerships looking for marketing help rather than operational change.
Dealer principals whose used car manager has the role but not yet the acquisition judgment to consistently perform in it. Used car managers who want to develop the buying skills that come from experience faster.
Direct, on-the-floor development focused on acquisition judgment, market reading, and process discipline. This is working alongside the manager on the actual decisions they are making (appraising cars, running auction analysis, sourcing the right inventory for the market) and building the skills through doing the work.
Delivered as part of an operations engagement or as a standalone service. Scope defined based on the manager's current level and what the dealership needs them to be able to do independently.
Dealer principals who are being approached by AI and technology vendors in the automotive space and want an independent evaluation before committing budget.
There are more than 40 companies currently claiming AI capability in the automotive industry. Most of them have a demo. Fewer of them can specifically explain what their product does, how it produces the result they are promising, or what happens when the market conditions their model was trained on change.
Dealers are being asked to make significant technology decisions without the technical background to evaluate the claims. Most do not have the time or the right questions to ask.
I run a structured evaluation of the vendor against what they are claiming to deliver. That covers their stated methodology, the data their product is trained on, how it performs under the market conditions your dealership actually operates in, and what the contract obligates you to beyond the initial term. I attend the demo directly and apply an evaluation framework built from 20 years of automotive operations and direct vendor experience. You receive a written assessment with a single recommendation: keep it, renegotiate it, or replace it.
Project-based. Scoped per vendor evaluation. Can be conducted before a contract decision or as an audit of an existing vendor relationship. Single vendor assessments and full stack reviews are both available.
Technology companies and AI developers building products for the automotive market who need domain validation from someone who has operated inside the industry at scale. If your product depends on understanding how dealerships actually work, how buying decisions get made, how inventory moves, or how technology gets adopted on the floor, this engagement fills the gap between what your team knows and what the industry will actually accept.
Structured access to 20 years of floor-level automotive operations experience. I evaluate your product concept or existing build against how the industry actually operates, identify where assumptions built without field experience typically fail, and provide a direct assessment of what needs to change before the product reaches the market. Engagements are scoped to your stage of development, not open-ended retainers.
Three engagement formats depending on what you need.
Product Validation: A structured session evaluating your product concept against how automotive dealerships actually operate. Appropriate for early-stage development or before a first dealer conversation.
Technical Advisory: Domain expertise embedded into your development or pre-launch process for a defined period. Scoped to specific questions and product assumptions that need to be tested against operational reality.
Ongoing Advisory: Retained access for product teams who need a consistent voice from the field throughout development, launch, and iteration.
25,000 vehicles appraised and purchased is a reference point a focus group cannot replicate. Most technology companies building for automotive have access to market research, user interviews, and pilot data. Very few have access to someone who has made the exact types of operational decisions their product is designed to support, at that volume, across different markets and conditions.
If your used car department is underperforming and you want to know why, that is the conversation to have.
Independent evaluation of AI vendors in the automotive space. Before you spend budget on tools that do not deliver.
Most of them have a demo. Fewer of them can explain what their product actually does, how it produces the result they are promising, or what happens when the market conditions their model was trained on change.
Dealers are being asked to make significant technology decisions without the technical background to evaluate the claims. Most do not have the time or the right questions to ask.
That is the gap this service fills.
Existing contracts, upcoming renewals, or new vendors you are being pitched. I start with what you are actually being asked to spend money on.
Product claims against stated methodology. Training data sources and market relevance. Contract terms and what they obligate you to beyond the first year.
There are specific questions that reveal whether a product is real AI or automation with a polished front end. I ask those questions directly, on your behalf.
Keep it, renegotiate it, or replace it. The reasoning is in plain language, specific to your operation and your market.
Dealer principals who are being approached by AI and technology vendors in the automotive space and want an independent evaluation before committing budget. Also for dealers who are already under contract and want to know whether the tool they are paying for is delivering what the vendor claimed.
Product claims against actual methodology. Training data sources and whether they are relevant to your specific market. Contract terms and what they obligate you to beyond the initial commitment. Whether the vendor can answer direct technical questions about how their product works.
In practice, those questions separate real AI infrastructure from automation that has been rebranded to command a higher price. Most vendors cannot answer them specifically.
Project-based. Scoped per vendor evaluation. Can be conducted before a contract decision or as an audit of an existing vendor relationship. Single vendor assessments and full stack reviews are both available depending on what the dealership needs.
The evaluation comes from someone with 20+ years on the floor of automotive operations, 10 years in management, and 25,000+ vehicles bought and appraised. That background means the assessment is grounded in what a dealership actually needs a tool to do, not what a vendor claims it can do for someone else's operation in a different market.
Zero revenue from AI vendors. No conflicts of interest. The only party paying for this evaluation is the dealership.
I evaluate them so you are not paying for a demo dressed up as a solution.
Most technology evaluators come from a software background. This evaluation comes from someone who spent 20+ years making operational decisions inside automotive dealerships, including buying and appraising more than 25,000 vehicles at CarMax. The questions I ask are the ones a dealer principal or used car manager actually needs answered, not the ones on a generic due diligence checklist.
If your product is built for the automotive industry, it needs to work the way the industry actually works. Not the way it looks in a dataset. Not the way it performs in a controlled demo environment. The way a manager makes an operational decision under real conditions, with real constraints, in a real market.
20 years of automotive operations experience and 25,000 vehicles appraised gives you a reference point that market research cannot replicate. That experience spans acquisition, inventory management, dealer relationships, technology evaluation, and the on-the-ground realities that product teams building from the outside rarely have access to.
This is structured access to floor-level expertise that is genuinely rare. If your product depends on the automotive industry behaving the way you think it does, domain validation from someone who has operated inside it at scale is not optional.
A structured 90-minute session evaluating your product concept against how automotive dealerships actually operate. Covers dealer decision-making, operational workflows, how technology gets adopted on the floor, and where products built without field-level experience typically fail.
Domain expertise embedded into your development or pre-launch process for a defined period. Structured scope, specific questions answered, product assumptions tested against 20 years of operational reality. Appropriate for companies actively building or preparing to take a product to market.
Standing access for product teams who need a consistent voice from the field throughout development, launch, and iteration. Quarterly structured sessions plus defined response windows for questions that come up between sessions.
All advisory engagements are scoped and structured. If you are building for the automotive industry and need to pressure-test your assumptions against how it actually operates, that is the right conversation to start.
If your used car operation is underperforming and you want an outside assessment of why, that is the right conversation to start. The first call is a direct discussion about your dealership's situation.
Use the form below or reach out directly at maz@carsultant4u.com. I will review your situation before we speak so the conversation is specific to your operation.